On a macro level, the T20 World Cup is a grand success. After a long time, a World Cup seems like a World Cup. Twenty teams have taken part in it to start with. The event has been brought to a new country, the capital of capitalism. Afghanistan and co-hosts USA have made it through to the Super Eight. One of the qualifiers from Group D will not be from the top two seeds, and England are on a knife’s edge in Group B. There have been ties and many a close match. There is representation, there is unpredictability, matches have been tight if not high-scoring, and there are conditions creating jeopardy for the more established teams.
The Super Sopper at work in Lauderhill on Saturday – on Friday, it had issues•ICC/Getty Images
“As a team we wanted to play,” India’s batting coach Vikram Rathour said. “You are right, when you are in a tournament like the World Cup, you want to carry on playing cricket, so as a team you don’t want to lose the momentum that you’ve gained. But again, conditions, I don’t know whether it rained here or not. The place we were staying at, it didn’t really rain yesterday. So again, not for me to say how and what happened, but yeah, it’s disappointing that we can’t get it going.
“We were really looking forward to play a game and we were expecting better batting conditions than what we got in New York. So as a team I think it was important for us to get a game but, again, something that we can’t control, we don’t control. So, it’s unfortunate that we couldn’t get a game here.”
India will now go from a week of no cricket to playing three Super Eight matches in five days in three different Caribbean islands. Rathour could just shrug and say it is not ideal.
“I think the next time ICC will review this, that the ground should be completely covered, so as soon as the rain stops, we can play the match.”
Pakistan’s Imad Wasim
Pakistan of course don’t want to be seen using this an excuse, and they shouldn’t have left themselves in such a situation, but their allrounder Imad Wasim did say the ICC needed to review the situation. “This depends on ICC, how they will review this,” Imad said when asked about the ground not being fully covered. “I think, if the wicket and square is dry… I’ll give you one reason, when we play in Sri Lanka or any other place, they cover the entire ground. And the venue where the game is being played, there are around 20-30-35 people to take care of this. I think the next time ICC will review this, that the ground should be completely covered, so as soon as the rain stops, we can play the match.”
It is not like established cricket centres are always fully prepared to ensure viewers get as much cricket as they can. As an extreme example, as recently as 2016, a Test match in Port-of-Spain couldn’t be played despite no rain on the days of the match because of poor drainage, but the venue received due criticism and poor ratings, which have consequences in the future.
There was some informal talk among people at the ICC about possibly swapping the 2028 T20 World Cup in England with this one, but it was a non-starter because England’s summer is planned seemingly decades in advance. And there is never going to be the “perfect time” to break new ground so the ICC can’t be blamed for pushing for this even if it did so with less-than-perfect conditions to play in.
The stadium in Dallas, run by Major League Cricket (MLC), showed it was well prepared – it had play and in great conditions despite unprecedented rains leading up to, and even on the afternoon of, the first matchday. The same can’t be said of the facility in Lauderhill, run by the Broward County. Despite its best intentions, the ICC has left itself vulnerable to criticism by not taking over ground preparation more actively.
It would be too harsh to evoke Oscar Wilde’s quote about best intentions and worst outcomes, but surely the ICC can’t be happy with what has happened over the weekend in Florida?
